2003 reasons to delete Vista
Looong story short, after Dell lost my Windows XP laptop they replaced eventually it with a new laptop (hooray!) with Windows Vista (boo!). Sure, I got used to it – but its a constant struggle. Once you strip down Vista, yanking out all the features that make it different from Windows XP, its not that bad. But, then again, there isn’t much good about it either. More than 18 months after the release of Vista, here’s my reason to not use it:
- User Access Control
- It requires more resources (hard drive space, RAM, processor speed)1
- It will not work with MS Office 2003
In this day and age, there is exactly one reason to have Windows – Microsoft Office. If you want to play games, you’re better off with an XBox or PlayStation 3. If you want to surf the web, you can use your phone. For anything else, you can use a Mac or Linux.
A friend of mine confided that when her copy of MS Office 2003 didn’t work with Vista she bought MS Office 2007. This exact problem, my copy of MS Office 2003 not being able to run on my laptop running Vista, is why I turned to OpenOffice. Here’s the vicious cycle I perceive:
- Your old computer is slow.
- Buy a new computer.
- New computer comes with newest version of Windows.
- You buy all new software to run on the new version of Windows.
- Your computer is now loaded down with so much junk you need a faster computer.
I absolutely refuse to believe Microsoft is incapable of figuring out a way for their newest operating system to work with the world’s most popular office productivity software. The only possible explanation I will accept is that Microsoft is using the manufacturer’s theory of LRR.2
- Compare Windows XP’s requirements to Windows Vista’s for yourself. [↩]
- Lather, rinse, repeat. [↩]
