Old versus New Schedule
I heard the best workers’ compensation joke yesterday. ((Photo courtesy of dklimke)) Here goes:
- “Is this an old or new schedule case?”
- “Of course it’s old schedule. Just look how old it is!”
I heard the best workers’ compensation joke yesterday. ((Photo courtesy of dklimke)) Here goes:
There was a great turn out this morning to the “How to Obtain an Accurate PD Rating with the AMA Guides” put on by the Workers’ Compensation Section of the State Bar. We covered a lot of ground in just two hours, from the DEU perspective presented by Annalisa Faina and Barry Knight entitled “Anatomy of Rating”, to Mark Gearheart’s “Substantial Medical Evidence to Support a Permanent Disability Rating,” and my own presentation on “Litigating Ogilvie.” There was a lively discussion on the state of Almaraz/Guzman, Blackledge, and Ogilvie. ((Lively as in “barely civil”)) ((I’m kidding!))
Thanks to everyone who e-mailed me asking for the cases cited during our presentations. I’ll be uploading them shortly.
Tonight is the “2010 Steve Jimenez Special Recognition Awards” honoring:
If you’re attending tonight, please stop me and say hello! (I’ve got a name tag and everything)
My prior record for doctor depositions was three in one month. This was not at all intentional. It was probably a number of factors. I tend to take more doctor depositions than most. ((Photo courtesy of Little Miss no Name. Photo editing – all me!)) Almaraz/Guzman issues are usually best addressed during a deposition. And, lastly it just happened to be an extra busy month.
This week I attended three doctor depositions (two set by myself, one set by a co-defendant). I’d say that pretty well trumps three in a month. :)
A special shout-out goes to Doctors Z, J, and C. Thanks for putting up with me guys. Also, special thanks to Mr. W, my co-Defendant without whom this wouldn’t have been possible.
Update: Download Milpitas United School District v. WCAB and Guzman, 6th Appellate District Court H034853, ADJ3341185, SJO0254688!
Looks like Milpitas Unified School District v. WCAB and Guzman is here to stay. ((Photo courtesy of funkandjazz)) The 6th Appellate Court has just affirmed the WCAB’s decision in full.
Where does this leave us? Well, under “Almaraz/Guzman II” we need to get a “strict AMA” and either side can obtain an “Almaraz/Guzman II” opinion from the doctors based upon rebuttal evidence, with the Judge being the final arbiter.
What else does this mean? I’m probably going to break my personal record for the most doctor depositions in a single month.
Click here for more in depth coverage of Guzman!
This afternoon I am presenting at the Workers’ Compensation Section Spring Conference 2010 with a presentation entitled, “Calculating Ogilvie.” Due to cases relevant to Ogilvie coming out as recently as ten days ago, I’m making the resources mentioned here for everyone to download (along with a rough outline of the presentation).
Sample Ogilvie DFEC analysis brief, complete with citations, explanations, and exhibits